Comments on: Clojure and Lisp http://www.lexparse.com/2009/10/27/clojure-and-lisp/ Software Development Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:25:57 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Mark http://www.lexparse.com/2009/10/27/clojure-and-lisp/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Mark Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:33:44 +0000 http://lexparse.com/?p=28#comment-3 Good point. Updated post. Good point. Updated post.

]]> By: Brian http://www.lexparse.com/2009/10/27/clojure-and-lisp/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Brian Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:50:59 +0000 http://lexparse.com/?p=28#comment-2 Just a note: in F#, |> is just another infix operator. You can define it yourself: "let (|>) x f = f x". It just happens to be defined in the core library because it is handy. Macros can indeed be handy, but you don't need macros to create user-defined operators in F#. Just a note: in F#, |> is just another infix operator. You can define it yourself: “let (|>) x f = f x”. It just happens to be defined in the core library because it is handy.

Macros can indeed be handy, but you don’t need macros to create user-defined operators in F#.

]]>